Skip to content

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
    • Help
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
C
circaoldhouses
  • Project
    • Project
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Cycle Analytics
  • Issues 33
    • Issues 33
    • List
    • Board
    • Labels
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
  • Annie Jacoby
  • circaoldhouses
  • Issues
  • #1

Closed
Open
Opened Jun 15, 2025 by Annie Jacoby@anniejacoby512
  • Report abuse
  • New issue
Report abuse New issue

Determining Fair Market Value Part I.


Determining reasonable market price (FMV) can be a complex procedure, as it is extremely depending on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each appraisal project. Appraisers must work out professional judgment, supported by credible data and sound method, to identify FMV. This typically needs cautious analysis of market patterns, the accessibility and reliability of similar sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would perform under common market conditions involving a prepared buyer and a willing seller.

This article will attend to determining FMV for the intended use of taking an income tax reduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being stated, this method is applicable to other designated uses. While Canada's meaning of FMV varies from that in the US, there are lots of similarities that permit this general methodology to be used to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will deal with Canadian language particularly.
libertypropertymanagement.com
Fair market price is defined in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as "the price at which residential or commercial property would change hands in between a prepared purchaser and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having affordable knowledge of appropriate truths." 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) expands upon this meaning with "the fair market price of a specific item of residential or commercial property ... is not to be identified by a forced sale. Nor is the fair market value of an item to be identified by the sale cost of the product in a market aside from that in which such item is most typically sold to the general public, considering the location of the item any place suitable."

The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there must be no distinction between the definition of price for various tax usages and for that reason the combined definition can be utilized in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the best starting point for guidance on determining fair market worth. While federal policies can seem complicated, the existing version (Rev. December 2024) is only 16 pages and uses clear headings to assist you find crucial info quickly. These principles are also covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, beginning at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, discovered at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, supplies an essential and succinct visual for figuring out fair market price. It lists the following factors to consider provided as a hierarchy, with the most trustworthy indications of determining reasonable market price listed first. Simply put, the table exists in a hierarchical order of the strongest arguments.

1. Cost or market price 2. Sales of equivalent residential or commercial properties 3. Replacement expense 4. Opinions of professional appraisers

Let's check out each factor to consider separately:

1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer's expense or the real market price gotten by a qualified company (an organization eligible to get tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) might be the very best indication of FMV, particularly if the deal happened near the valuation date under common market conditions. This is most dependable when the sale was recent, at arm's length, both celebrations understood all appropriate realities, neither was under any obsession, and market conditions stayed steady. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) defines "arm's length" as "a transaction in between one celebration and an independent and unassociated celebration that is conducted as if the two parties were strangers so that no dispute of interest exists."

This aligns with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which states the appraiser should offer enough details to suggest they adhered to the requirements of Standard 7 by "summarizing the outcomes of examining the subject residential or commercial property's sales and other transfers, arrangements of sale, alternatives, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was essential for trustworthy assignment results and if such details was offered to the appraiser in the typical course of company." Below, a remark further states: "If such information is unobtainable, a declaration on the efforts carried out by the appraiser to acquire the details is needed. If such information is unimportant, a declaration acknowledging the existence of the info and citing its lack of importance is required."

The appraiser must request the purchase price, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors might hesitate to share this details, it is required in Part I of Form 8283 and likewise appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for items valued over $50,000. Whether the donor declines to supply these details, or the appraiser figures out the info is not relevant, this ought to be plainly recorded in the appraisal report.

2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are one of the most reliable and frequently used approaches for figuring out FMV and are especially convincing to intended users. The strength of this method depends on a number of essential elements:

Similarity: The closer the comparable is to the donated residential or commercial property, the more powerful the evidence. Adjustments need to be made for any differences in condition, quality, or other value appropriate attribute. Timing: Sales ought to be as close as possible to the evaluation date. If you use older sales information, initially confirm that market conditions have stayed steady which no more recent comparable sales are readily available. Older sales can still be utilized, however you should adjust for any changes in market conditions to show the existing value of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale needs to be at arm's length between informed, unpressured parties. Market Conditions: Sales must happen under regular market conditions and not throughout uncommonly inflated or depressed durations.

To pick proper comparables, it is essential to fully comprehend the meaning of reasonable market price (FMV). FMV is the price at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a ready purchaser and a ready seller, with neither celebration under pressure to act and both having sensible understanding of the truths. This meaning refers particularly to real completed sales, not listings or quotes. Therefore, just sold results ought to be utilized when figuring out FMV. Asking costs are merely aspirational and do not reflect a consummated transaction.

In order to pick the most typical market, the appraiser should consider a wider introduction where equivalent secondhand items (i.e., secondary market) are offered to the public. This normally narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two unique markets with different characteristics. It is very important not to combine comparables from both, as doing so fails to plainly recognize the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you should think about both markets and then choose the best market and include comparables from that market.

3. Replacement Cost: Replacement cost can be thought about when figuring out FMV, however just if there's a sensible connection between a product's replacement expense and its fair market worth. Replacement cost refers to what it would cost to change the product on the valuation date. In most cases, the replacement expense far surpasses FMV and is not a dependable indication of worth. This method is utilized rarely.

4. Opinions of expert appraisers: The IRS allows professional opinions to be considered when determining FMV, however the weight given depends on the expert's certifications and how well the opinion is supported by facts. For the viewpoint to carry weight, it should be backed by trustworthy evidence (i.e., market information). This approach is used rarely. Determining fair market value includes more than using a definition-it requires thoughtful analysis, sound approach, and trusted market information. By following IRS assistance and thinking about the realities and scenarios connected to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will even more check out these principles through real-world applications and case examples.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
0
Labels
None
Assign labels
  • View project labels
Reference: anniejacoby512/circaoldhouses#1