questionsanswered.net
Co-owning residential or commercial property as occupants in common is the favored kind of joint ownership in California. (Wilson v. S.L. Rey, Inc. (1993) 17 Cal.App.4 th 234, 242 (S.L. Rey).) Yet, residential or commercial property kept in occupancy in typical brings with it a special set of possible issues that are not present in the other types of joint ownership acknowledged by the state. (see California Civil Code, § 682.)

Different ownership interest portions in between co-owners can impact one's responsibilities for typical expenses and levels of disbursement on a sale. A fiduciary relationship in between joint owners can disrupt a co-owner's ability to obtain an encumbrance. Payments for enhancements to the residential or commercial property might not be recoverable in an accounting action if considered "unnecessary." These are simply some of the problems we will try to resolve in this post about the financials of occupancies in typical.

Developing Co-Owned Residential Or Commercial Property

At the beginning, it is necessary to keep in mind the crucial functions for holding title as occupants in typical. A "occupancy in common simply needs, for production, equivalent right of possession or unity of belongings." (S.L. Rey (1993) 17 Cal.App.4 th 234, 242.) In essence, "all occupants in common deserve to share equally in the ownership of the whole residential or commercial property." (Kapner v. Meadowlark Ranch Assn. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4 th 1182, 1189.) But because equivalent ownership is the only requirement, this indicates that occupants in common can hold title in various ownership portions. (see Donnelly v. Wetzel (1918) 37 Cal.App.741 [occupants in common held a one-third and two-thirds proportion of ownership, respectively])

For an in-depth discussion on the distinctions in between tenancies in common and joint occupancies, please see our prior post on the subject.

If each tenant in common can possess the residential or commercial property, does that imply each is equally accountable for enhancements? The response is no. "Neither cotenant has any power to compel the other to join with him in setting up buildings or in making any other enhancements upon the typical residential or commercial property." (Higgins v. Eva (1928) 204 Cal.231, 238.) Grant improvements, however, does not affect a final accounting in a partition action. "Even though one cotenant does not authorization to the making of the enhancement ... a court of equity is needed to take into consideration the improvements which another cotenant, at his own expense in excellent faith, put on the residential or commercial property which enhanced its value." (Wallace v. Daley (1990) 220 Cal.App.3 d 1028, 1036 (Wallace).) Enhancement to worth is a notable term. Case law recommends that ordinary expenditures, like those for maintenance and repairs, are unrecoverable in accounting actions if made by and for the advantage of the cotenant in ownership of the residential or commercial property. (see Gerontopoulos v. Gerontopoulos (1937) 20 Cal.App.2 d 261, 265.) Therefore, while a tenant in common can freely invest in such common expenditures, even without the authorization of co-owners, they may not be recoverable.

Financing Residential Or Commercial Property Development

There is also a question of how a cotenant may finance developments to co-owned residential or commercial property. Suppose two renters in common got a mortgage in the procedure of buying genuine residential or commercial property. But subsequently, one of them got a second encumbrance on their interest for further improvements. This is the exact scenario that in Caito v. United California Bank (1978) 20 Cal.3 d 694. There, there were two liens encumbering the residential or commercial property. The cotenants, the Caitos and the Caponis, were both accountable on the note secured by the very first trust deed on the residential or commercial property.

However, without the understanding or approval of the Caitos, the Caponis protected particular notes by positioning a second trust deed on the Caponis' interest in the residential or commercial property. The court held that "when a cotenant has separately encumbered his interest in the residential or commercial property and, as here, such encumbrance is among the secondary liens, it attaches only to such cotenant's interest." (Id.) In essence, one cotenant might overload his interest in the residential or commercial property, however that encumbrance impacts his interest only. (Schoenfeld v. Norberg (1970) 11 Cal.App.3 d 755, 765.)

Selling Residential Or Commercial Property as Tenants in Common

As a basic rule, each cotenant may sell their interest in the residential or commercial property without approval or consent from the other cotenants. (Wilk v. Vencill (1947) 30 Cal.2 d 104, 108-109 [" One joint occupant may get rid of his interest without the authorization of the other"]) But a tenant in typical might not sell the entire residential or commercial property without the authorization of the other co-owners. "A cotenant has no authority to bind another cotenant with regard to the latter's interest in common residential or commercial property." (Linsay-Field v. Friendly (1995) 36 Cal.App.4 th 1728, 1734.)

If, nevertheless, a cotenant feels the entire residential or commercial property requires to be offered, then they might bring a partition action. By statute, a co-owner of personal residential or commercial property is authorized to start and maintain a partition action. (CCP § 872.210.) Moreover, this right is outright. (Lazzarevich v. Lazzarevich (1952) 39 Cal.2 d 48, 50.) And "such right exists even where the residential or commercial property is subject to liens, and whoever takes an encumbrance upon the undivided interest of a cotenant need to take it subject to the right of the others to have such a partition. (Lee v. National Collection Agency, Inc. (N.D. Cal 1982) 543 F.Supp. 920, 922.)

Accounting

At the end of every partition action, the court conducts an accounting. "Every partition action includes a final accounting according to the concepts of equity for both charges and credits upon each cotenant's interest. Credits consist of expenses in excess of the cotenant's fractional share for needed repairs, improvements that improve the value of the residential or commercial property, taxes, payments of principal and interest on mortgages, and other liens, insurance coverage for the common advantage, and security and preservation of title." (Wallace, 220 Cal.App.3 d 1028, 1036-1037.) These credits are secured of the net proceeds before the sales balance is divided similarly. (Southern Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Nelson (1964) 230 Cal.App.2 d 539.) "When a cotenant advances from his own pocket to maintain the typical estate, his financial investment in the residential or commercial property boosts by the entire quantity advanced. Upon sale of the estate, he is entitled to his repayment before the balance is equally divided." (Nelson, 230 Cal.App.2 d, at 541 pointing out William v. Koyer (1914) 168 Cal.369.)

Can Unequal Contribution Payments Affect Accounting?

Yes. The most important feature of an accounting is that its inevitability requires the ownership percentages of the residential or commercial property to be put at problem.

In a fit for partition, "all celebrations' interest in the residential or commercial property may be put in issue despite the record title." (Milian v. De Leon (1986) 181 Cal.App.3 d 1185, 1196 (Milian).) "The deed ... [is] just one product of proof to be considered by the court in connection with other probative facts." (Kershman v. Kershman (1961) 192 Cal.App.2 d 23, 26.) If two co-owners declare to hold title to the residential or commercial property as joint occupants, the court "might think about the fact the parties have actually contributed different amounts to the purchase cost in identifying whether a real joint occupancy was meant." (Milian, 181 Cal.App.3 d at 1196.)

An occupancy in common is various in this regard. Ownership interests are not presumed to be equal, as the unity of interest is not a requirement for its production. (CCP § 685.) "If a tenancy in typical, rather than a joint occupancy is discovered, the court might either purchase compensation or identify the ownership interests in the residential or commercial property in percentage to the quantities contributed." (Milian, 181 Cal.App.3 d at 1196.)

This was the case in Kershman. There, two previous partners had purchased a home for $16,000. The other half put up $8,000, while the partner set up just $1,000 of his own cash and borrowed the rest with a mortgage. The arrangement appeared to approve both celebrations ownership of the residential or commercial property in equal shares of 50%. Yet, this was not to be up until the hubby paid off the mortgage, which he never did. On that proof, the trial court minimized the partner's supposed ownership share to 6.7% based on his real quantity contributed being only $1,000. "This testimony amply supports the implied finding that the complainant and offender had concurred that their interests were not to be equal till the accused had actually paid his share which their interests were to represent at any given point of time the synchronous percentage of their particular contributions in relation to the total." (Kershman, 192 Cal.App.2 d at 27.)

Thus, a cotenant's unequal down payment may affect their ownership interest in the residential or commercial property, provided no oral arrangement or understanding in between the cotenants supplied otherwise.

How can the Attorneys at Underwood Law Office, P.C. Assist You?

Partition actions get rather complicated when ownership interests become a problem. An agreement can negate unequal payments, mortgages can impact distributions, and lengthy accounting procedures can swell litigation expenses. As each case is unique, residential or commercial property owners would be well-served to look for skilled counsel familiar with the ins-and-outs of partitions. At Underwood Law Office, P.C., our experienced lawyers are here to help. If you are concerned about the title to your residential or commercial property, what expenses may be recoverable, or if you just have concerns, please do not be reluctant to contact our office.